Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43, 865–880.
Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 544–557.
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1160.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
Bliese, P. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 389–444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.
Cannella, A. A., Park, J., & Lee, H. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member co-location and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 768–784.
Carmeli, A. (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group and Organization Management, 33, 712–735.
Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 207–218.
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2006). Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 441–453.
Chatenier, E. D., Verstegen, J. A. A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R&D Management, 40, 271–280.
Chen, M. H., Chang, Y. C., & Hung, S. C. (2008). Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 38, 21–34.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Daghfous, A. (2004). Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69, 21–27.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dumaine, B. (1994). The trouble with teams. Fortune, 130(5), 86–92.
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.
Goodman, J. S., & Blum, T. C. (1996). Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. Journal of Management, 22, 627–652.
Gully, S. M., Beaubien, J. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., & Joshi, A. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832.
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171–214). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Review, 37, 110–128.
Hambrick, D. C. (1998). Corporate coherence and the top management team. In D. C. Hambrick, D. A. Nadler, & M. L. Tushman (Eds.), Navigating change: How CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation (pp. 123–140). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1346–1352.
Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modeling: Nonnormal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57, 327–351.
Houghton, S. M., Simon, M., & Goldberg, C. B. (2000). No safety in numbers: Persistence of biases and their effects on team risk perception and team decision making. Group and Organization Management, 25, 325–353.
Huang, C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29, 786–797.
Huang, M., Contractor, N., Huang, Y., Margolin, D., Ognyanova, K., & Shen, C. (2010). The effects of diversity and repeat collaboration on team performance in distributed nonscientist teams. Montreal: Paper presented in the Academy of Management Meeting.
Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people. Organization Science, 15, 232–240.
Hunt, J. W., & Baruch, Y. (2003). Developing top managers: The impact of interpersonal skills training. Journal of Management Development, 22, 729–752.
Iansiti, M., & West, J. (1999). Technology integration: Turning great research into great products. In M. Iansiti, J. West, H. Chedbrough, & D. J. Teece (Eds.), Harvard business review on managing high-tech industries (pp. 1–29). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenceck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input–process–output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina: Interaction Book Company.
Kaiser, R., Woodruff, B. A., Bilukha, O., Spiegel, P. B., & Salama, P. (2006). Using design effects from previous cluster surveys to guide sample size calculation in emergency settings. Disasters, 30, 199–211.
Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581–598.
Keller, R. T. (1994). Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 167–179.
Kim, Y., Min, B., & Cha, J. (1999). The roles of R&D team leaders in Korea: A contingent approach. R&D Management, 29, 153–165.
Kirkbride, P. (2006). Developing transformational leaders: The full range leadership model in action. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38, 23–32.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Lessem, R., & Baruch, Y. (2000). Testing the SMT and Belbin inventories in top management teams. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21(2), 75–83.
Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership’s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 557–576.
Lubatkin, M., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance on small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.
Magni, M., Proserpio, L., Hoegl, M., & Provera, B. (2009). The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Research Policy, 38, 1044–1053.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476.
McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Miller, L. K., & Hamblin, R. L. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. American Sociological Review, 28, 768–777.
Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89–106.
Mooney, A., & Sonnenfeld, J. (2001). Exploring antecedents to conflict during strategic decision making: The importance of behavioral integration. Paper presented in the Academy of Management Meeting. Washington, DC: BPS Division.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2000). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Kinicki, A. J., Waldman, D. A., Xiao, Z., & Song, L. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 34–72.
Peters, L., & Karren, R. J. (2009). An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group and Organization Management, 34, 479–504.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Ramamoorthy, N., & Flood, P. C. (2004). Gender and employee attitudes: The role of organizational justice perceptions. British Journal of Management, 15, 247–258.
Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Groups as human resources. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 323–356). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709–1721.
Siegel, P. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Business strategy and the social psychology of top management teams. In P. Shrivastava, A. Huff, & J. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (pp. 91–119). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M., Veiga, J., & Dino, R. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 69–84.
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.
Somech, A., Desivilya, H. S., & Lidogoster, H. (2008). Team conflict management and team effectiveness: The effects of task interdependence and team identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 359–378.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135–148.
Subin, I., & Workman, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68, 114–132.
Tekleab, A. G., Karaca, A., Quigley, N. R., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2016). Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3500–3507.
Thamhain, H. J. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management, 33, 297–311.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M. L., & West, M. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group and Organization Management, 29, 540–559.
Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., & van de Vliert, E. (2000). Affective responses to intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management, 26, 633–655.
Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729–751.
Van der Vegt, G. S., van de Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and OCB: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 715–727.
Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180.
Wageman, R. (2001). How leaders foster team self-management: The relative effects of design activities and hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12, 559–577.
Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 307–334.
Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). Team strategic context: Implications for process and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 501–518.
Zhang, Y., Zeng, D., Zhang, L., & Lu, L. Y. (2007b). R&D team governance and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese software enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 2, 71–83.
Zhang, Z. X., Hempel, P. S., Han, Y. L., & Tjosvold, D. (2007a). Transactive memory system links team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1722–1730.