Skip to main content

Table 10 Robustness check (January 1, 2010, to April 15, 2013)

From: Half-day trading and spillovers

 

\( {R}_{m,t}^c \)

\( {R}_{a,t}^c \)

\( {R}_{d,t}^c \)

Panel A: Asymmetric BEKK-GARCH model estimation results

Mean equation

  γi, 11

−0.061* (− 1.689)

−0.107*** (− 2.894)

−0.066* (− 1.784)

  γi, 12

0.298*** (9.377)

− 0.026 (− 1.046)

0.280*** (6.224)

  γi, 21

0.028 (− 0.888)

0.060 (1.626)

0.011 (0.476)

  γi, 22

6.856 × 10− 3 (− 0.019)

−0.011 (− 0.280)

−0.012 (− 0.292)

Variance equation

  ai, 12

−0.054 (− 1.087)

0.056 (1.168)

0.019 (0.432)

  ai, 21

0.025 (0.366)

− 0.024 (− 0.909)

5.167 × 10− 3 (0.053)

  bi, 12

0.098*** (2.950)

0.023 (1.093)

0.075*** (3.614)

  bi, 21

−0.035** (− 2.475)

−0.016* (− 1.926)

−0.056*** (− 2.659)

  di, 12

0.041 (0.817)

− 0.025 (− 0.502)

0.035 (0.859)

  di, 21

0.168*** (2.988)

− 0.054** (− 2.097)

0.248*** (3.168)

Panel B: Test of volatility spillover effects between two countries

Volatility spillovers

  The US to China

(ai, 21 = bi, 21 = di, 21 = 0)

3.582*** [0.013]

2.268* [0.078]

4.037*** [0.007]

  China to the US

(ai, 12 = bi, 12 = di, 12 = 0)

4.742*** [0.003]

0.658 [0.578]

5.730*** [0.000]

  1. Notes. Panel A reports the estimation results of the asymmetric BEKK-GARCH model. Panel B reports the F-test of the volatility spillover effects based on the estimation results of Panel A
  2. One, two and three asterisks (*), respectively, indicate that the t-values are significant at the 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01 level