- Research Article
Individual and collective interorganizational Guanxi: The dynamics of Guanxi and knowledge sharing
Frontiers of Business Research in China volume 5, pages 473–489 (2011)
The significance of interorganizational relationship is discussed in multiple streams of literature. However, many studies assume that interorganizational relationship is a uni-level construct. This paper suggests that interorganizational guanxi presents at both the individual and collective levels, and discusses how the dynamics of interorganizational guanxi influences knowledge sharing between alliances. The paper reinforces the concept of collective level interorganizational guanxi, reveals the link between individual level and collective level guanxi, and distinguishes the two levels of guanxi by analyzing their impacts on knowledge sharing between organizations. A theoretical model is developed and calls for further investigation through empirical research.
Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. N. 2004. Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15(2): 159–172.
Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1999. Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China. Organization Science, 10(3): 237.
Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 10(2): 349–399.
Chen, C. C., Chen, Y. R., & Xin, K. 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2): 200–209.
Chen, X & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3), 305–324
Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledgesharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 345–367.
Fan, Y. 2002a. Guanxi’s consequences: Personal gains at social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(4): 371.
Fan, Y. 2002b. Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International Business Review, 11(5): 543–561.
Fei, X. 1992. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society, A translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gu, F. F., Hung, K., & Tse, D. K. 2008. When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and its dark sides. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 12–28.
Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 82–111.
Hansen, M. T. 2002. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3): 232–248.
Lee, D. J., Pae, J. H., & Wong, Y. H. 2001. A model of close business relationships in China (guanxi). European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2): 51.
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2008. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 383–400.
McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11): 1033–1055.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242–266.
Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. D. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5): 455–477.
Ramasamy, B., Goh, K. W., & Yeung, M. C. H. 2006. Is guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer? Journal of Business Research, 59(1): 130–139.
Simon, H. A. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6): 467–482.
Standifird, S. S. 2006. Using guanxi to establish corporate reputation in China. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(3):171–178.
Tsang, E. W. K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 64.
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. 1997. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2): 447–504.
Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 57–91.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4): 409–421.
Yang, M. M.-h. 1994. Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Yeung, I. Y. M., & Tung, R. L. 1996. Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25(2): 54.
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. 2006. Guanxi and organizational dynamics in China: A link between individual and organizational levels. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4): 375.
Zhao, Z. J., & Anand, J. 2009. A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: Evidence from the Chinese automotive industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9): 959–983.
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, B. Individual and collective interorganizational Guanxi: The dynamics of Guanxi and knowledge sharing. Front. Bus. Res. China 5, 473–489 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0141-4
- Social Capital
- Knowledge Sharing
- Organizational Identity
- Strategic Management Journal
- Structural Hole