Skip to main content

Ethical leadership in Chinese organizations: Developing a scale

Abstract

In light of a series of ethical scandals in China in recent years, this research aims to develop a reliable and valid scale to measure ethical leadership, namely the “ethical leadership measure (ELM).” Our results show that ELM is strongly and positively correlated with scales for authentic leadership, ethical leadership, idealized influence, and a recently-developed leadership virtues questionnaire (LVQ); and negatively correlated with laissez-faire leadership and passive management by exception. ELM is also found to be positively related to followers’ job satisfaction, affective commitment, trust in leader, organizational citizenship behavior, and moral identity, and negatively related to followers’ intention to quit.

References

  • Aronson, E. 2001. Integrating leadership styles and ethical perspectives. Canadian Journal of Administrative Studies, 18(4): 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. 2005. Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16: 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Nassen, K. D. 1998. Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1–2): 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. 2003. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2): 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. 1999. Ethics, character and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2): 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. 2003. Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5): 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proeesses, 97: 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. X., & Francesco, A. M. 2003. The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(3): 490–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. 1998. Ethics, the heart of leadership. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola, D. L. 1998. Moral leadership: A proposed theory illustrated by select Catholic secondary school principals. Retrieved March 11, 2004, from http://www.lib.umi.com/dissertation/fullcit/19839504

  • Dirks, K. T. 2000. Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6): 1004–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich J. M., Nichols M. L., Elm D. R., & Vollrath D. A. (1990). Moral reasoning in groups: Leaders make a difference. Human Relations, 43: 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4: 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L. 范丽群, Shi, J. 石金涛, & Zhou, Z. 周祖成. 2006. 伦理型领导探讨 (Discussion on ethical leadership). 理论探讨 (Theoretical Investigation), (1): 115–118.

  • Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. 1977. Servant Leadership. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. 1994. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49: 493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. 1977. A theory of charismatic leadership. In Hunt, J. G., & Larson, L. L. (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. 2001. Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 1039–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A., & Thibodeaux, M. S. 1999. Institutionalization of ethics: The perspective of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(2): 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N., & Mendonca, M. 1996. Ethical dimensions of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuntia, R. P., & Suar, D. 2004. A scale to assess ethical leadership of Indian private and public sector managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1): 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, J., & Hammer, T. H. 1986. Clerical employees’ perceptions of intra organizational career opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2): 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, W. 凌文铨, Chen, L. 陈龙, & Wang, D. 王登. 1987. CPM 领导行为量表的建构 (A scale to measure CPM leadership behavior). 心理学报 (Acta Psychologica Sinica), (2): 199–207.

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. 1996. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3): 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, S. J. 1994. Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in education administration. London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonea, M. 2001. Preparing for ethical leadership in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Studies, 18(4): 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. 2003. A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1): 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. 2000. Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4): 128–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. 2008. Authentic leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. 吴明隆. 2003. SPSS 统计应用实务 (SPSS: Practical application of statistics). 北京: 科学出版社 (Beijing: Science Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. 2002. Leadership in organizations (5th Ed.). Englewood Clivs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W., Riggio, R., Avolio, B.J., & Sosik, J. J. in press. The effect of leadership on follower moral identity: Does transformational/transactional style make a difference? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Yu, H. et al. Ethical leadership in Chinese organizations: Developing a scale. Front. Bus. Res. China 5, 179–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0127-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0127-2

Keywords

  • ethical leadership
  • moral identity
  • affective commitment