- Research Article
Family supportive culture, work-life segmentation and employee’s organizational attachment: The case of high-tech industry in Taiwan
Frontiers of Business Research in Chinavolume 5, pages79–95 (2011)
This study examines the relationship among family supportive culture, organizational attachment, and work-life segmentation in high-tech service industry in Taiwan, China. Using survey data from 369 professionals, this study shows that family supportive culture has significant influence on organizational attachment, namely, affective commitment. Results indicate that individuals’ work-life segmentation has a significant negative effect on organizational attachment. Meanwhile, our results further apply employees’ segmentation between work and life as a moderator to investigating the impact of individual’s perceptions of family supportive culture and values on a sense of attachment toward organizations. The result illustrates that work-life segmentation does not moderate the relationship between supportive family culture and employees’ organizational attachment. Findings from this research provide insights into the influence of organizational family supportive culture and how it may further encourage employees’ organizational attachment in high-tech industry in Taiwan.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1–18.
Allen, T. D. 2001. Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 58: 414–435.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. 2000. All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25: 472–491.
Baral, R., & Bhargava, S. 2010. Work-family enrichment as a mediator between organizational interventions for work-life balance and job outcomes. Journal of Management Psychology, 25(3): 274–300.
Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. 2007. The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4): 592–610.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. 1997. Interviewers’ perceptions of person-organizational fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 546–561.
Chang, E. 1999. Career commitment as a complex moderator of organizational commitment and turnover intention. Human Relations, 52(10): 1257–1278.
Chiu, C. K., & Ng, C. W. 1999. Women-friendly HRM and organizational commitment: A study among women and men of organizations in Hong Kong. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 485–502.
Chiu, C. K., & Ng, C. W. 2001. The differential effects of work- and family-oriented women-friendly HRM on OC and OCB: The case for single female employees in Hong Kong. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(8): 1347–1364.
Clark, S. C. 2000. Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53: 747–770.
Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. 2005. Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 66: 124–197.
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. 1999. Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behaviour Human Decision Processes, 77: 85–129.
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. 2000. Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25: 178–199.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. 1990. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 51–59.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, S. J. 1985. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1): 76–88.
Grover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. 1995. Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48: 271–288.
Heider, F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hyman, J., Baldry, C., Scholarios, D., & Bunzel, D. 2003. Work-life imbalance in call centres and software development. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2): 215–239.
Nippert-Eng, C. 1996. Home and work: negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. 2006. Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68: 432–445.
Perlow, L. A. 1995. Putting the work back into work/family. Group and Organizational Management, 20: 227–239.
Perlow, L. A. 1998. Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 328–357.
Rothbard, N. P. 2001. Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 655–684.
Rothbard, N. P., Phillips, K. W., & Dumas, T. L. 2005. Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organization Science, 16(3): 243–258.
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. 1999. When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilisation, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 54: 392–415.
Winkel, D. E., & Clayton, R. W. 2009. Transitioning between work and family roles as a function of boundary flexibility and role salience. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.011.
Xu, D. X. 2003. The antecedents and consequences of work values on work attitude for the different generations—A study of high technology industries in Taiwan. Unpublished dissertation, National Central University, Taiwan, China