Skip to main content
Frontiers of Business Research in China
Download PDF

Multimarket contact and firm performance: The moderating effect of Confucian culture

Frontiers of Business Research in China volume 5, pages 45–62 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of Confucian cultural value on the relationship between multimarket contact and two dimensions of firm performance, i.e., firms’ innovation and profitability. It is hypothesized that firms with a high level of multimarket contact are more likely to show mutual forbearance towards their competitors, which in turn influences their innovative behavior and financial performance. Taking into account the possible moderating effects of Confucian cultural value, we also hypothesize that the effect of multimarket contact is more pronounced among firms from the Confucian culture. In other words, it is argued that firms from the Confucian culture are more likely to innovate and obtain better financial performance. Empirical tests were conducted after the hypotheses, and the findings support the arguments on multimarket contacts and mutual forbearance hypotheses. Through facilitating tacit collusion, multimarket contact does seem to help create superior economic performance.

References

  • Adler, N. J. 1986. International dimensions of organizational behavior. Boston, MA: Kent Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. L. 1985. An empirical test of the mutual forbearance hypothesis: The case of bank holding companies. Southern Economic Journal, 52: 122–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. B. 2001. Can antitrust keep up? Brookings Review, (winter): 15–19.

  • Baum, J. A. C., & Singh, J. V. 1994. Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational founding. Organization Science, 5(4): 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., & Korn, H. J. 1996. Competitive dynamics of inter firm rivalry. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 225–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., & Korn, H. J. 1999. Dynamics of dyadic competitive interaction. Strategic Management Journal, 20(3): 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, J. 2000. Competitive pressure: The effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(3): 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, W. S. 1965. Research and technical change in the pharmaceutical industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47: 182–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, M. D. R., & Chang, K. Y. 2009. Determinants of the share of equity sought in cross-border acquisitions. International Journal of Business Studies, 40: 1277–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. 1996. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21: 100–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B. 2008. China’s new Confucianism: Politics and everyday life in a changing society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. N., & Meyer, K. E. 2004. Subsidiary research and development, and the local environment. International Business Review, 13: 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W., & Kessides, I. 1994. Living by the “golden rule”: Multimarket contact in the United States airline industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X. 1995. The Chinese cultural system: Implications for cross-cultural management. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 60(1): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. 1984. Harm to others. Oxford: Oxford University Press; relevant passage reprinted in J. M. Fischer (Ed.), The metaphysics of death: 171–190. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentelsaz, L., & Gomez, J. 2006. Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 477–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, B. R., & Ma, H. 2003. Mutual forbearance: The role of intrafirm integration and rewards. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, J. 1999. Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: Staking out spheres of influence in the US airline industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2): 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, J., & Woo, C. 1999. Multimarket contact, economies of scope, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 239–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. 2008. A behavioral theory of firm growth. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 476–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A., & Noeenmker, L. 2000. Competition in multiple geographic markets: The impact on growth and market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 232–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heggestad, A. A., & Stephen, A. R. 1978. Multimarket interdependence and local market competition in banking. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 60: 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M., Gupta, V., et al. 1999. Cultural influences on leadership an organization: Project GLOBE. In W. H. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, & V. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in global leadership: 171–233. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K., & Oughton, C. 1993. Diversification, multimarket contact and profitability. Economica, 60: 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzschenreuter, T., & Voll, J. C. 2008. Performance effects of “added cultural distance” in the path of international expansion: The case of German multinational enterprises. International Journal of Business Studies, 39: 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jans, I., & Rosenbaum, D. 1996. Multimarket contact and pricing: Evidence from the U.S. cement industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15: 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran, S., Gimeno, J., & Varadarajan, P. R. 1999. Theory of multimarket competition: A synthesis and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 63: 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, N. M. 1979. The innovating firm: A behavioral theory of corporate R&D. New York: Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, H. J., & Baum, J. A. C. 1999. Chance, imitative, and strategic antecedents to multimarket contact. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Putterill, M. 2007. Strategy implications of business culture differences between Japan and China. Business Strategy Series, 8(2): 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lam, K., Sun, J. M., & Liu, X. Y. 2008. Strategic human resource management, institutionalization, and employment modes: An empirical study in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2): 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lam, K., Karakowsky, L., & Qian, G. 2003. Firm resources and first movers advantages-A case of foreign direct investment in China. International Business Review, 12(5): 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lam, K., & Qian, G. 2001. Does culture affect behavior and performance of firms: The case of joint venture in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H. 1998. Mutual forbearance in international business. Journal of International Management, 4: 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., & Iriyama, A. 2009. Understanding global flows of venture capital: Human networks as the “carrier wave” of globalization. International Journal of Business Studies, 40: 1241–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R. P., & Nelson, R. R. 1994. On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L. J. 1987. A multiproduct cost study of savings and loans. Journal of Finance, 42: 423–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster, S. M. 1990. Modern competitive analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Nowak, P. 1976. Joint ventures and interorganizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 398–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S. M. 1993. Three factors affecting reward allocations in the former USSR: An empirical study. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, (3): 279–298.

  • Prince, J. T., & Simon, D. H. 2009. Has the internet accelerated the diffusion of new products? Research Policy, 38(8): 1269–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W. 1999. Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7): 655–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 1982. Multimarket contact and economic performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 64: 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 1991. Multimarket contact among diversified oligopolists. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9: 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selmer, J. 1997. Vikings and dragons: Swedish management in Southeast Asia. Hong Kong: The David C. Lam Institute for East-West Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singal, V. 1996. Airline mergers and competition: An integration of stock and product price effects. Journal of Business, 69: 233–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonortas, N. S. 2000. Multimarket contact and inter-firm cooperation in R&D. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1–2): 243–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walikangas, L., & Gibbert, M. 2005. Boundary-setting strategies for escaping innovation traps. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3): 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., & Simon, D. 2000. Multimarket contact and resource dissimilarity: A competitive dynamics perspective. Journal of Management, 26(6): 1217–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T., & Cannella, A. A. 2007. Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3): 663–684.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China

    Guiyao Tang & Ji Li

  2. School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Xinran Wang

Authors
  1. Guiyao Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ji Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinran Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guiyao Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, G., Li, J. & Wang, X. Multimarket contact and firm performance: The moderating effect of Confucian culture. Front. Bus. Res. China 5, 45–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0120-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0120-9

Keywords

  • multimarket contact
  • mutual forbearance
  • Confucian culture