Skip to main content

Dispositional antecedents and consequences of workplace ostracism: An empirical examination

Abstract

Drawing on the victim precipitation theory and self-esteem theory, this study examines the dispositional antecedents and consequences of workplace ostracism. Using data from 208 employees and their 96 immediate supervisors in two petroleum and gas companies in China, this study finds that agreeableness and extraversion are negatively, and neuroticism is positively related to workplace ostracism. Moreover, workplace ostracism is found to be negatively related to employee job performance, and this relationship is mediated by employee organization-based self-esteem.

References

  1. Akaike, H. 1987. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52: 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anthony, D. B., Holmes, J. G., & Wood, J. V. 2007. Social acceptance and self-esteem: Tuning the sociometer to interpersonal value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6): 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aquino, K. 2000. Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M., & Allen, D. G. 1999. The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah Y A (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Paunonen, S. V. 2002. What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. 2006. Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 998–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, methodology: 389–444. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models: 136–162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, Z. X., & Aryee, S. 2007. Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. 1979. Quasi experimentation: Design and analytical issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. 2000. Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9: 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Curtis, L. A. 1974. Victim precipitation and violent crimes. Social problems, 21: 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. DiPaula, A., & Campbell, J. D. 2002. Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 711–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dipboye, R. L. 1977. A critical review of Korman’s self-consistency theory of work motivation and occupational choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18: 108–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Donnellan, M. B., Conger, R. D., & Bryant, C. M. 2004. The big five and enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38: 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. 1996. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6): 1327–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. 2002. Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Elias, R. 1986. The politics of victimization: Victims, victimology, and human rights. New York: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Erez, A., & Judge, T. A. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1270–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eysenck, H. J. 1976. Personality, genetics, and behavior. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. 2008. The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1348–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fox, S., & Stallworth, L. E. 2005. Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66: 438–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldberg, L. R. 1990. An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. 1997. Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology: 795–824. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. 1996. Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 820–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hobfoll, S. E. 1989. Conservation of resources: A new approach at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44: 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hogan, J., & Holland, B. 2003. Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Horney, K. 1937. The neurotic personality of our time. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hui, C. H. 1988. Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22: 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hui, C., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. 1999. A Structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader-member exchange and perceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance: A Chinese case. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77: 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. 1999. The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research: 102–138. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. 1995. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118: 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Korman, A. K. 1966. Self-esteem variable in vocational choice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50: 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Korman, A. K. 1970. Toward a hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54: 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. 2001. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liao, H., & Chuang, A. 2004. A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. 2006. Linking proactive personality and the big five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 927–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mathieu, J. E., & Farr, J. L. 1991. Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60: 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. 1992. Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. New York: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. 2000. Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard regulates attachment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 478–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., MacDonald, G., & Ellsworth, P. C. 1998. Through the looking glass darkly? When self doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 1459–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C 2008. Long work hours: A social identity perspective on meta-analysis data. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 853–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Olweus, D. 1978. Aggression in the schools: bullies and whipping boys. Toronto, ON: JohnWiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. 2004. Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30: 591–622.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. 1989. Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 622–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. S., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. 1995. Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60: 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. 2009. Identifying targets of counterproductive behavior: The role of personality and physical appearance. Paper present at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Chicago

  55. Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. 2003. Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 60–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Seibert, S., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sobel M E (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13: 290–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sommer, K. L., Williams, K. D., Ciarocco, N. J., & Baumeister, R. F. 2001. When silence speaks louder than words: Explorations into the intrapsychic and interpersonal consequences of social ostracism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23: 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfill, T., & Richards, H. 2000. Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4: 44–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., Vanman, E. J., & Tassinary, L. G. 2000. Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79: 656–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. 1973. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wilkins, A., & Dyer, W. Jr. 1988. Toward culturally sensitive theories of cultural change. Academy of Management Review, 13(4): 522–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Williams, K. D. 1997. Social ostracism. In R. M. Kowalski (Eds.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors: 133–170. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Williams, K. D. 2001. Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Williams, K. D. 2007. Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 425–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17: 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Longzeng Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, L., Wei, L. & Hui, C. Dispositional antecedents and consequences of workplace ostracism: An empirical examination. Front. Bus. Res. China 5, 23–44 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0119-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • personality traits
  • workplace ostracism
  • organization-based self-esteem
  • job performance