Skip to main content

Do continuous and categorical measures capture the same construct of diversity? Evidence from China

Abstract

Chinese researchers have long preferred substantive research (i.e., examination of relationships among variables) to construct validation research, while failing to realize that construct validation research is the foundation of substantive research. This paper endeavors to answer a question: Do Rumelt’s (1974) categorical and Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) and skill-based continuous measures capture the same construct of diversity in the context of China? We take two steps to investigate the question. First, are continuous measures (SIC & skill-based entropy and Montgomery product count) appropriately differentiated among Rumelt’s categories? Second, are the categories converted from SIC & Skill-based measures convergent to Rumelt’s categorical measures? Results show that the two measures are consistent with each other.

References

  1. Amit R, Livant J (1988a). A concept of conglomerate diversification. Journal of Management, 14(4): 593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amit R, Livant J (1988b). Diversification strategies, business cycles and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baysinger B, Hoskisson R E (1989). Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 310–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berry C H (1971). Corporate growth and diversification. Journal of Law and Economics, 14(2): 371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bettis R A (1981). Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2(4): 379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd B K, Gove S, Hitt M A (2005). Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: The case of Amihud and Lev. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4): 367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chartterjee S, Blocher J D (1992). Measurement of firm diversification: Is it robust? Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 874–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christensen H K, Montgomery C A (1981). Corporate economic performance: Diversification strategy vs. market structure. Strategic Management Journal, 2(4): 327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farjoun M (1998). The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7): 611–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank R E, Massy W F, Morrison D G (1965). Bias in multiple discriminate analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(3): 250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gort M (1962). Diversification and Integration in American Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hall E H, John C H (1994). A methodological note on diversity measurement. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2): 153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoskisson R E, Hitt M A, Johnson R A, Moesel D D (1993). Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 215–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacquemin A, Berry C (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4): 359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ketchen D, Shook C (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6): 441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Markham J W (1973). Conglomerate Enterprise and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  17. Markides C C (1995). Diversification, restructuring and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2): 101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer M, Whittington R (2003). Diversification in context: A cross-national and cross-temporal extension. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8): 773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McVey J S (1972). The industry diversification of multi-establishment manufacturing firms: A developmental study. Canadian Statistical Review, 47(1): 112–117

    Google Scholar 

  20. Montgomery C A (1982). The measurement of firm diversification: Some new empirical evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2): 299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montgomery C A (1985). Product-market diversification and market power. Academy of Management Journal, 28(12): 789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nayyar P R (1992). On the measurement of corporate diversification strategy: Evidence from large U.S. service firms. Strategic Management Journal, 13(3): 219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Palepu K (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3): 239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pitts R, Hopkins D (1982). Firm diversity: Conceptualization and measurement. Academy of Management Journal, 7(4): 620–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramanujam V, Varadarajan P (1989). Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6): 523–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rumelt R P (1974). Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rumelt R P (1982). Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4): 359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwab D (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior, in: Staw B M, Cummings L L (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 2–43

    Google Scholar 

  29. Varadarajan P, Ramanujam V (1987). Diversification and performance: A reexamination using a new two-dimensional conceptualization of diversity in firms. Academy of Management Journal, 30(2): 380–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Venkatraman N, Grant J H (1986). Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 11(1): 71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wood A (1971). Diversification Merger and Research Expenditures: A Review of Empirical Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wrigley L (1970). Divisional autonomy and diversification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School

  33. 洪 道麟, 熊 德华 (Hong Daoling, Xiong Dehua) (2006). 中国上市公司多元化与企业绩效分析 (The analysis of the relationship between diversification of China’s listed companies and firm performance). 金融研究, (11): 33–43

  34. 黄 海波 (Huang Haibo) (2007). 中国房地产类上市公司多元化与企业绩效的实证分析 (The empirical study of the relationship between diversification of China’s listed real estate companies and firm performance). 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 27(1): 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  35. 姜 付秀, 刘 志彪, 陆 正飞 (Jiang Fuxiu, Liu Zhibiao, Lu Zhengfei) (2006). 多元化经营、 企业价值与收益波动研究—以中国上市公司为例的实证研究 (Diversification, firm value, and the return variance: An empirical study of China’s listed companies). 财经问题研究, (11): 27–35

  36. 李 敬 (Li Jing) (2002). 多元化战略 (Diversification Strategy). 上海: 复旦大学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  37. 李 玲, 赵 瑜纲 (Li Ling, Zhao Yugang) (1998). 中国上市公司多元化经营的实证研究 (An empirical study of diversification of China’s listed companies). 证券市场导报, (5): 31–42

  38. 倪 桂平, 张 晖 (Ni Guiping, Zhang Hui) (2005). 上市公司的业绩、 股权结构与多元化经营研究 (Firm performance, ownership structure, and diversification of China’s listed companies). 山东工商学院学报, 19(2): 43–48

    Google Scholar 

  39. 邱 金辉, 候 剑平 (Qiu Jinhui, Hou Jianping) (2006). 多元化对上市公司生产效率影响的实证研究 (An empirical study of the effect of diversification on the productivity of China’s listed companies). 系统工程, 24(11): 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  40. 邵 军, 刘 志远 (Shao Jun, Liu Zhiyuan) (2006). 多元化战略对맜理层激励的影响—来自中国资本市场的经验证据 (The effect of diversification strategy on motivating the manager: The evidence from China capital market). 当代经济科学, 28(2): 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  41. 姚 俊, 吕 源, 蓝 海林 (Yao Jun, Lü Yuan, Lan Hailin) (2004). 我国上市公司多元化与经济绩效关系的实证研究 (An empirical study of the relationship between diversification of China’s listed companies and the economic performance). 맜理世界, (11): 117–125

  42. 尹 义省 (Yin Yisheng) (1998). 中国大型企业多角化实证研究—兼与美国大公司比较分析 (An empirical study of diversification of China’s large enterprises: Comparing with US). 맜理工程学报, 12(3): 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  43. 张 卫国, 袁 芳, 陈 宇 (Zhang Weiguo, Yuan Fang, Chen Yu) (2002). 上市公司多元化战略与经济绩效关系实证分析 (An empirical study of the relationship between diversification strategy and economic performance of China’s listed companies). 重庆大学学报, 25(11): 135–139

    Google Scholar 

  44. 朱 江 (Zhu Jiang) (1999). 我国上市公司的多元化战略和经营业绩 (Diversification strategy of China’s listed companies and firm performance). 经济研究, (11): 54–61

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jieyu Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jia, L., Wan, G., Zhou, J. et al. Do continuous and categorical measures capture the same construct of diversity? Evidence from China. Front. Bus. Res. China 4, 423–450 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0105-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • diversification
  • continuous measures
  • categorical measures
  • Standard Industrial Classification