Skip to main content

Proactiveness, legitimation via ISO certification and the growth of SMEs in China

Abstract

According to the literature on entrepreneurial orientation (EO), proactive firms are more likely to achieve first-mover advantage and higher performance. The neoinstitutionalism, however, suggests that enterprises with more legitimacy will acquire more growth opportunities. Usually, the first mover might face more legitimacy obstacles. To date, there has been little research on how proactive firms cope with legitimacy constraints and achieve firm growth. Integrating the legitimacy perspective and the EO literature, this research examines the roles of ISO certification as a strategy for seeking legitimacy of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in emerging economies, and the relationship between proactiveness and firm performance. In particular, it hypothesizes that ISO certification has a mediating effect on the relationship between proactiveness and firm growth. We test the hypothesis using a sample of 632 firms collected from a nationwide survey on SMEs conducted by the Chinese SME Association. The results reveal that ISO certification partially mediates the relationship between proactiveness and firm growth, suggesting that proactive firms tend to use legitimation via ISO certification to enhance firm growth. Our paper contributes to the literature by shedding light on the important relationship between seeking legitimacy, entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth in SMEs in an emerging economy.

References

  1. Aderson J C, Gerbing D W (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashforth B E, Gibbs B W (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2): 177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker W E, Sinkula J M (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4): 443–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baron R M, Kenny D A (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baum J R, Locke E A, Smith K G (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boiral O (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14(6): 720–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourgeois L J (1980). Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. Academy of Management Review, 5: 25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chin W, Newsted P (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small sampling using partial least squares, In: Rick Hoyle (ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research. CA: Sage Publications, 307–341

    Google Scholar 

  9. Covin J G, Slevin D P (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Covin J G, Slevin D P (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16(1): 7–24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deephouse D L (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 1024–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delmar F, Shane S (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 385–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dess G, Lumpkin T (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1): 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dess G, Lumpkin T, Covin J G (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 677–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DiMaggio P J, Powell W (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DiMaggio P J, Powell W (1991). Introduction to the New Institutionalism in Organization Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dowling J, Pfeffer J (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1): 122–136

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau M (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7): 1–77

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hargadon A B, Douglas Y (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative of Science Quarterly, 46: 476–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haunschild P R, Miner A S (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 472–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu L, Bentler P M, Kano Y (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112: 351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Judd C M, Kenny D A (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5): 602–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y, Zhao Y B, Tan J, Liu Y (2008). Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: Evidence from Chinese small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1): 113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lieberman M B, Montgomery D B (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lieberman M B, Montgomery D B (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12): 1111–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lumpkin T, Dess G (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maurer J G (1971). Readings in Organizational Theory: Open System Approaches. New York: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer J, Rowan B (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller D (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7): 770–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller D, Friesen P H (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3): 221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nadkarni S, Narayanan V K (2007). Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clock speed. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 243–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oliver C (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Parsons T (1960). Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pfeffer J, Salancik G R (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  35. Podsakoff P, Organ D (1986). Self reports in organizational leader reward and punishment behavior and research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruef M, Scott W R (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4): 877–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Scott W R (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shepherd D A, Zacharkis A (2003). A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customer. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2): 148–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh J V, Tucker D J, House R J (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2): 171–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stam W, Elfring T (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1): 97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stinchcombe A L (1965). Organizations and Social Structure. In: James G March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 142–193

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stuart T, Hoang H, Hybels R (1999). Inter-organizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 315–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Suchman M C (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Teece D J (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Terreberry S (1968). The evolution of organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 590–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tornikoski E T, Newbert S L (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Weber M (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribners

    Google Scholar 

  48. Weber M (1968). Economy and Society: An Interpretive Sociology, Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich (eds.). New York: Bedminister Press

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wiklund J, Shepherd D (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1307–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3): 414–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zott C, Huy Q N (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 70–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zucker L G (1983). Organizations as institutions. In: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 2, Bacharach S B (eds.). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1–42

    Google Scholar 

  53. 侯 杰泰, 温 忠麟, 成 子娟 (Hau Kit-Tai, Wen Zhonglin, Cheng Zijuan) (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用 (Structural Equation Model and Its Applications). 北京: 教育科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  54. 李 乾文 (Li Qianwen) (2007). 公司创业导向的差异分析—基于环渤海地区企业所有权差异的实证研究 (Difference analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation: Empirical research based on enterprise ownership difference of Bohai sea region). 科学学研究, 25(4): 708–710

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunzhou Du.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Guanli Shijie 管理世界 (Management World), 2008, (12): 126–138

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, Y., Ren, B., Chen, Z. et al. Proactiveness, legitimation via ISO certification and the growth of SMEs in China. Front. Bus. Res. China 4, 283–305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0013-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • proactiveness
  • legitimation
  • institution theory
  • ISO certification
  • firm growth