Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

The effects of two kinds of corporate publicity on customer-brand relationship

Abstract

In the recent marketplace, corporate brands are exposed to a variety of corporate publicity, which may elicit unexpected consumer responses and requires more academic attention. This study explores how two kinds of corporate publicity (ability-related vs. social responsibility-related) influence customer-brand relationship. We propose that both kinds of publicity influence customer-brand relationship strength through brand trust and brand affect. In addition, the interaction pattern between the two kinds of publicity is further examined. Two competing hypotheses predicting divergent patterns of the interaction effect are proposed. A 2×2 between-subject experiment is conducted in the context of fast food service industry. Results show that, after controlling the existing customer-brand relationship, social responsibility-related publicity has significant influence on the strength of customer-brand relationship, while ability-related publicity has no such effect, given the fact that consumers probably have developed well-established perceptions on the focal company’s ability. Furthermore, the specific interaction pattern between the two kinds of publicity is consistent with the prediction based on fairness heuristic theory. In addition, brand trust and brand affect play mediating roles in the mechanism through which corporate publicity influences customer-brand relationship.

References

  1. Aaker J, Fournier S, Brasel S A (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June): 1–16

  2. Aggarwal P (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1): 87–101

  3. Ahluwalia R, Burnkrant R E, Unnava H R (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2): 203–214

  4. Bengtsson A (2003). Towards a critique of brand relationships. Advances in Consumer Research, 30: 154–158

  5. Berens G, Van Riel C B M, Van Bruggen G H (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69(July): 35–48

  6. Bond J, Kirshenbaum R (1998). Under the Radar: Talking to Today’s Cynical Consumer. New York: Wiley

  7. Brockner J (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 58–76

  8. Brockner J, Siegel P A, Daly J, Tyler T R, Martin C (1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 558–583

  9. Chaudhuri A, Holbrook M B (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(April): 81–93

  10. Chowdhary N, Prakash M (2005). Service quality: Revisiting the two factors theory. Journal of Services Research, 5(1): 61–75

  11. Dacin P A, Brown T J (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(January): 68–84

  12. Dahlen M, Lange F (2006). A disaster is contagious: How a brand in crisis affects other brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(4): 388–397

  13. Dawar N, Pillutla M M (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2): 215–226

  14. Fiske S (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6): 889–906

  15. Fornell C, Johnson M D, Anderson E W, Cha J, Bryant B (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Description, findings, and implications. Journal of Marketing, 60(October): 7–18

  16. Fournier S (1998). Consumer and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(March): 343–373

  17. Fournier S, Yao J L (1997). Reviving brand loyalty: A reconceptualization within the framework of consumer-brand relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14: 451–472

  18. Garbarino E, Johnson M S (1999). The different role of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63(April): 70–87

  19. Geyskens I, Steenkamp E M, Kumar N (1999). A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2): 223–238

  20. Griffin M, Babin B J, Attaway J S (1991). An empirical investigation of the impact of negative public publicity on consumer attitudes and intentions. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1): 334–341

  21. Gurhan-Canli Z, Batra R (2004). When corporate image affects product evaluations: The moderating role of perceived risk. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(May): 197–205

  22. Henard D H (2002). Negative publicity: What companies need to know about public relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 47(4): 8–12

  23. Hui M, Zhao X, Fan X, Au K (2004). When does the service process matter? A test of two competing theories. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(September): 465–474

  24. Keller K L (2001). Building customer-based brand equity. Marketing Management, 10(Jul/Aug): 14–19

  25. Klein J, Dawar N (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3): 203–217

  26. Kroloff G (1988). At home and abroad: Weighing in. Public Relations Journal, 44(October): 8

  27. Lei J, Dawar N, Lemmink J (2006). The impact of information characteristics on negative spillover effects in brand portfolios. Advances in Consumer Research, 33(1): 324–32

  28. Lind E A, Tyler T R (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press

  29. Luo X, Bhattacharya C B (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(October): 1–18

  30. Maddox R N (1981). Two-factor theory and consumer satisfaction: Replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(1): 97–102

  31. Mayer R C, Davis J H, Schoorman F D (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 709–734

  32. Menon G, Jewell R D, Unnava H R (1999). When a company does not respond to negative publicity: Cognitive elaboration vs. negative affect perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1): 325–329

  33. Moorman C, Gerald Z (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3): 314–328

  34. Morgan R M, Hunt S D (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(July): 20–38

  35. Petty R E, Krosnick J A (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  36. Pullig C, Netemeyer R G, Biswas A (2006). Attitude basis, certainty, and challenge alignment: A case of negative brand publicity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4):528–542

  37. Renkema J, Hoeken H (1998). The influence of negative newspaper publicity on corporate image in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Communication, 35(4): 521–535

  38. Rethans A J, Swasy J L, Marks L J (1986). Effects of television commercial repetition, receiver knowledge, and commercial length: A test of two-factor model. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(1): 50–61

  39. Sen S, Bhattacharya C B (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May): 225–243

  40. Sherell D L, Reidenbach E R (1986). A consumer responses framework for negative publicity: Suggestions for responses strategies. Akron Business and Economic Review, 17(2): 37–44

  41. Singh J, Sirdeshmukh D (2000). Agency and trust mechanism in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1): 150–167

  42. Sirdeshmukh D, Singh J, Sabol B (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1): 15–37

  43. Stammerjohan C, Wood C M, Chang Y, Thorson E (2005). An empirical investigation of the interaction between publicity, advertising, and previous brand attitudes and knowledge. Journal of Advertising, 34(4): 55–67

  44. Swan J E, Combs L J (1976). Product performance and consumer satisfaction: A new concept. Journal of Marketing, 40(2): 25–33

  45. Thorbjornsen H, Supphellen M, Nysveen H, Pedersen P E (2002). Building brand relationships online: A comparison of two interactive applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(3):17–34

  46. Weinberger M G, Romeo J B (1991). Negative product safety news: Coverage, responses, and effects. Business Horizons, 34(3): 23–31

  47. 何 佳讯 (He Jiaxun) (2006). 品牌关系质量的本土化模型: 高阶因子结构与测量 (An indigenous study on High-order Factors model of brand relationship quality and its applications). 营销科学学报, 2(3): 97–108

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Siqing Peng.

Additional information

Translated and revised from Nankai Guanli Pinglun 南开管理评论 (Nankai Business Review), 2009, 12(1): 1–12

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Keywords

  • corporate publicity
  • social responsibility
  • corporate ability
  • customer-brand relationship
  • brand affect
  • brand trust