Skip to main content

Effects of transactional leadership, psychological empowerment and empowerment climate on creative performance of subordinates: A cross-level study

Abstract

This research surveyed 101 teams, involving 497 team members and 101 team leaders, in a large multinational company in China. A hierarchical linear model is used to examine the hypothesized mediated moderation model. It is found that: (1) individual psychological empowerment is positively related to creative performance; (2) the relationship between transactional leadership and subordinates’ creative performance is moderated by team empowerment climate; (3) individual transactional leadership behavior is positively related to subordinates’ creative performance in teams with higher empowerment climate, but negatively related to subordinates’ creative performance in lower empowerment climate; and (4) the relationship between transactional leadership, team empowerment climate and creative performance is partially mediated by subordinates’ psychological empowerment perception. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are also discussed.

References

  • Amabile T M (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Stow B M & L. L. Cummings L L (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.10. Greenwich, Conn: J.A.I. Press, 123–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile T M, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996). Assessing the workplace for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1154–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T M, Hennessey B A, Grossman B S (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37: 122–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron R M, Kenny D A (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6: 1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass B M (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass B M, Avolio B J (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Sampler Set: Technical Report, Leader Form, and Scoring Key for MLQ Form 5x-Short. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu R, Green S G (1997). Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27: 477–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard K H, Carlos J P, Randolph W A (1995). The empowerment barometer and action plan. Escondido, CA: Blanchard Training and Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese P D (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: Klein K J & Kozlowski S W J (eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 349–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole M S, Bedeian A G (2007). Leadership consensus as a cross-level contextual moderator of the emotional exhaustion-work commitment relationship. Leadership Quarterly, 18: 447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci E, Ryan R (1985). The support of autonomy and control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 53: 1024–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne S D, Yammarino F J, Howell J P, Villa J R (2005). Substitutes for Leadership, or Not? Leadership Quarterly, 16(1): 169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger R, Shanock L (2003). Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity: A Case Study of Conceptual and Methodological Isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15: 121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George J M, Zhou J (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 513–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James L R (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James L R, Demaree R J, Wolf G (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 306–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge T A, Piccolo R F (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5): 755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge T A, Bono J E (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung D I, Sosik J J (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33(3): 313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung D I (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2): 185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr S, Jermier J M (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 22(3): 375–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman B L, Rosen B (1997). A model of work team empowerment. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 10: 131–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman B L, Rosen B (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein K L, Kozlowski S W J (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multi-level research. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 211–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause D E (2004). Influence-based Leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An Empirical investigation. Leadership Quarterly. 15(1): 79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2008). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on innovativeness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6): 670–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Koh J (2001). Is empowerment really a new concept? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12: 684–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Wei F (2008). Uncover the black-box of leadership effectiveness: Leader-member exchange as the mediator. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2: 240–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller D, Judd C M, Yzerbyt V Y (2005). When moderation is meditated and when mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6): 852–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford M D, Scott S M, Gaddis B, Strange J M (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13: 705–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford T V, Campion M A, Morgeson F P (2007). The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly 18: 154–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1972). The Principles of Genetic Epistemology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Ahearne M, Bommer W H (1995). Searching for a needle in a haystack: Trying to identify the illusive moderators of leadership behaviors. Journal of Management, 21(3): 422–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn R E, Spreitzer G M (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamics, 26(2): 37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph W A (1995). Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4): 19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B, White S S, Paul M C (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 15–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott S G, Bruce R A (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 580–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert S E, Silver S R, Randolph W A (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 332–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel M E (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhardt S (ed.), Sociological Methodology. Washington DC: American Sociological Association, 290–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosik J J, Kahai S S, Avolio B J (1998). Transformational leadership and dimensions of creativity: Motivating idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2): 111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G M (1992). When organizations dare: The dynamics of individual empowerment in the workplace. University of Michigan, unpublished doctoral dissertation

  • Spreitzer G M (1995a). Psychological empowerment in the work place: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G M (1995b). An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5): 601–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G M (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 483–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G M, DeJanasz S C, Quinn R E (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 511–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G M, Kizilos M A, Nason S W (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23: 679–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas K W, Velthouse B A (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15: 666–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney P, Farmer S M, Graen G B (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52: 591–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino F J, Dionne S D, Chun J U, Dansereau F (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 16: 879–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Wei.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Guanli Shijie 管理世界 (Management World), 2009, (4): 135–142

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wei, F., Yuan, X. & Di, Y. Effects of transactional leadership, psychological empowerment and empowerment climate on creative performance of subordinates: A cross-level study. Front. Bus. Res. China 4, 29–46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0002-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0002-6

Keywords