Skip to main content

Dimensions and determinants of website brand equity: From the perspective of website contents

Abstract

This study develops a research model that can be used to evaluate website brand equity from the perspective of web contents. To evaluate the model and to examine the effects of web contents on brand equity, a SEM analysis is conducted on twenty Chinese websites which could be classified into four different types. The results show that the website brand equity model, which is composed of five dimensions, namely brand loyalty, perceived quality, brand relationship, brand experience and brand attraction, is useful for measuring website brand value, and also applicable to different web types. Web contents factors, such as recourses, design, service and interactivity, are found to be the antecedents of website brand equity, and they all affect dimensions of website brand equity. However, the effects vary according to web types. The results also demonstrate that portal websites’ brand equity value is the highest while shopping websites’ brand equity value is the lowest among the four web types. Suggestions and implications are provided for website brand management.

摘要

以品牌资产和网络营销相关理论为基础, 结合本土网站品牌的内容特性, 构建了基于消费者的网站品牌资产模型, 并通过测试四种类型的20个本土网站品牌对模型进行了检验, 同时分析了网站内容因素对品牌资产的影响。 研究发现: 由网站感知质量、 品牌体验、 品牌吸引力、 品牌关系和品牌忠诚五个变量构成的品牌资产能较好地反映网站品牌的整体价值, 在不同类型的网站中都具有较好的适用性; 网站资源、 设计/构成、 服务和互动等作为网站品牌资产前置因素的效应都得到了证实, 它们对品牌资产的影响力会随着网站类型的不同而略有变化; 所测试的本土门户网站的品牌价值整体较高, 而购物网站则较低, 这些结论为网站品牌资产的进一步研究提供了理论基础, 对于本土网站的品牌管理业具有指导意义。

References

  1. Aaker D A (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3): 102–120

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aaker D A, Joachimsthaler E (2000). Brand Leadership. New York: The Free Press, 115

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berry L L (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1): 128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaudhuri A, Holbrook M B (2001). The effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65: 81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Q and Rodgers S (2006). Development of an instrument to measure website personality. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1): 47–64

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cho C, Leckenby J D (1999). Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness. In: Roberts M S (ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 American Academy of Advertising, Pullman, WA, 162–179

  7. Christodoulides G, De Chernatony L (2004). Dimensionalising on and off-line brands’ composite equity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(3): 168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christodoulides G, De Chernatony L, Furrer O, Shiu E, Abimbola T (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring the equity of online brands. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(7–8): 799–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coyle J R, Thorson E (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3): 65–77

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dayal S, Landesberg H, Zeisser M (2000). Building digital brands. The McKinsey Quarterly, (2): 42–51

  11. Ha H Y, Perks H (2005). Effects of consumer perceptions of brand experience on the web: Brand familiarity, satisfaction and brand trust. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 4(6): 438–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman L D, Novak T (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60: 50–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman L D, Novak T, Yung Y F (2000). Measuring the consumer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1): 22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller K L (1993). Conceptualizing measuring and managing consumer-based brand equity. Journal of marketing, 57: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keller K L (2001). Building consumer-based brand equity. Marketing management, (July/August): 15–19

  16. Liu Y P, Shrum L J (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4): 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loiacono E, Watson R T, Goodhue D L (2002). Webqual: A measure of website quality. In: Proceedings of the American Marketing Association, (Winter): 432–438

  18. Mackay M M (2001). Evaluation of brand equity measures: Further empirical results. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(1): 38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Naude P, Buttle F (2000). Assessing relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management, (29): 351–361

  20. Nicholson C Y, Sethi R (2002). The dimensions of brand web site experience. In: Proceedings of the American Marketing Association, Winter Educators. Conference: Marketing Theory and Applications, Chicago, IL, Vol. 13, 510–511

    Google Scholar 

  21. Okazaki S (2006). Excitement or sophistication? A preliminary exploration of online brand personality. International Marketing View, 23(3): 279–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Page C, Lepkowska-White E (2002). Web equity: A framework for building consumer value in online companies. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(3): 231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Palmer J W (2002). Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(2): 151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rowley J (2004). Online branding. Online Information Review, 28(2): 131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowley J (2004). Online branding: The case of McDonald’s. British Food Journal, 106(3): 228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shih C (1998). Conceptualizing consumer experience in cyberspace. European Journal of Marketing, 32(7/8): 655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilkie W L (1994). Consumer Behavior (3rd edition). John Willey & Sons, 275

  28. Yoo B, Donthu N (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoo B, Donthu N, Lee S (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2): 195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liyin Jin.

Additional information

Translated and revised from Yingxiao Kexue Xuebao 营销科学学报 (Journal of Marketing Science), 2007, 3(3): 31–49

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jin, L. Dimensions and determinants of website brand equity: From the perspective of website contents. Front. Bus. Res. China 3, 514 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-009-0025-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • brand equity
  • website
  • formation mechanism
  • web contents

关键词

  • 品牌资产
  • 网站
  • 形成机制
  • 网站内容