Skip to main content

Does the traditional culture affect organizational identification? An analysis of the perception channels in organizational identification of Chinese employees

Abstract

This paper explores the information perception channels of organizational identification (OID) in the context of Chinese traditional culture. Drawing on the grounded theory, the authors conducted a survey on employees in Shandong, Henan, Beijing, Guangzhou, Gansu, Jiangsu and Taiwan, and developed a five-factor scale for information perception channels of OID consisting of leader modeling, consideration for subordinates, external encouragement, rationalizing norms and rules, and behavioral consistency. Results of regression analysis show that all of these five factors have significant effects on employees’ OID, particularly the factors of external encouragement, behavioral consistency, and consideration for subordinates.

摘要

为了研究员工在组织认同过程中的信息感知途径问题, 首先利用扎根理论的质化研究方法, 通过对山东、 河南、 北京、 广州、 甘肃、 江苏、 台湾等地企业的调研, 萃取组织认同信息感知途径量表, 然后收集有效问卷以检验假设。 结果表明, 在传统文化背景下, 组织认同的信息感知由率先垂范、 体恤关爱、 外部认可、 明理述规、 行为一致等五个维度构成, 通过对组织认同的多重回归分析发现, 它们对组织认同均具有显著性影响, 尤其是外部认可、 行为一致和体恤关爱预测力更强。

References

  1. Bollen K A (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breakwell G M, Lyons E (1996). Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Change. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corley K G, Gioia D A (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2): 173–208

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheney G (1982). Organizational identification as a process and product: A field study. Unpublished master’s thesis, Purdue University

  5. Cheney G (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69: 143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheney G, Christensen L T (2001). Organizational identity, In: Jablin F M and Putnam L L (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods, 231–269. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gioia D A, Thomas J B (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sense making during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 370–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang K K (1999). Chinese corporate culture and productivity. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, 7: 621–647

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patchen M (1970). Participation, Achievement, and Involvement on the Job. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  10. Price J L (1997). Handbook of organizational measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 18(2): 301–558

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smidts A, Riel C, Pruyn A (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5):1051–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mael F, Ashforth B E (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2): 103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Redding S G (1990). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism, 122–136. New York: Walter de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riketta M (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66: 358–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schultz M, Hatch M J, Larsen M H (2000). The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sillince J A (2006). Resources and organizational identities: The role of rhetoric in the creation of competitive advantage. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(2): 186–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whetten D A, Mackey A (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business and Society, 41: 393–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 马 忠 (Ma Zhong) (1993). 中国哲人的大思路 (The Ideology of Chinese Philosophers, 463–521. 西安: 陕西人民出版社

    Google Scholar 

  19. 徐 抗生 (Xu Kangsheng) (2005). 张岱年论中国哲学中的 “理”思想 (The research of Zhang Dainian on “Li” ideology in Chinese philosophy). 河北学刊, 25(1): 194–198

    Google Scholar 

  20. 赵 子仪 (Zhao Ziyi) (2007). 诸子百家 (Hundred Schools of Thought). 北京: 中国纺织出版社

    Google Scholar 

  21. 郑 伯熏 (Zheng Boxun) (2000). 家长式领导: 再一次思考 (Paternalistic leadership: A reconsideration). 心理学研究, (13): 219–227

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wei.

Additional information

Translated and revised from Zhongguo Gongye Jingji 中国工业经济 (China Industrial Economics), 2008, (6): 118–126

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wei, J., Zhang, M. & Yang, B. Does the traditional culture affect organizational identification? An analysis of the perception channels in organizational identification of Chinese employees. Front. Bus. Res. China 3, 343–361 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-009-0017-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • organizational identification
  • perception channels
  • traditional culture

关键词

  • 组织认同
  • 感知途径
  • 传统文化