Skip to main content

Corporate strategic management: Static and dynamic paradigms


Based on an analysis of the dynamic trend of the environment in which Chinese enterprises operate and the theory of dynamic competition, this paper seeks to propose a new strategic management pattern—the “dynamic paradigm”, which has mainly resulted from an integration of the theoretic contributions of the two strategic management streams. It ultimately aims at enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of strategic management in an environment full of uncertainties. The dynamic paradigm designed to explore today’s real business world is characterized by: 1) viewing strategic management as a process of both proactive plans and in-the-process reaction, both point and process decision-making and both rational and non-rational decision-making; 2) stressing the roles played by speed and innovation in the dynamic competition; 3) highlighting the inherent ties and the interaction among the three phases of strategic management; 4) emphasizing the critical impacts on the effectiveness and efficiency of strategic management by corporate governance, organizational structure, managerial mechanism, mode of control, composition of top-management team and corporate culture.


根据对中国企业环境动态化与动态竞争的分析, 以整合两大战略맜理流派的理论贡献为切入点, 以提高动态环境下企业战略맜理的有效性和效率为目的, 提出一个新的战略맜理模式—“动态模式”。 这个新的模式把战略맜理行为看成是事前计划与事中反应的结合, “点决策”与 “过程决策”的结合, 理性决策与非理性决策的结合; 强调速度与创新在动态竞争中的作用; 关注战略맜理三个阶段之间的内在联系与交叉影响; 重视公司治理、 组织结构、 맜理机制、 控制方式、 高层맜理团队构成以及企业文化对战略맜理有效性与效率的保证作用。


  1. Abrahamson E, Fombrun C J (1994). Macrocultures: Determinants and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 728–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews K R (1981). Replaying the board’s role in formulating strategy. Harvard Business Review, 59(3): 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ansoff H I (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandler A D (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen C R, Andrews K R, Porter M E (1982). Business Policy: Text and Cases (fifth edition). Homewood, IL: Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Aveni R A (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  7. George S D, David J R (1996). Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (first edition). New York: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes R H, Jaikumar R (1988). Manufacturing’s crisis: New technologies, obsolete organizations. Harvard Business Review, 9: 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jelinek M, Amar D (1983). Implementing corporate strategy: Theory and reality. The Third Annual Conference of the Strategic Management Society, Paris

  10. Lorange P (1980). Corporate Planning: An Executive Viewpoint. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J (1998). Strategy Safari. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mintzberg H (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mintzberg H (1987). Five Ps for Strategy. California Management Review, 30(1): 12–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter M E (1980). Competivite Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steiner G A (1969). Top Management Planning. New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steiner G A, Kunin H E (1983). Formal strategic planning in the United States today. Long Range Planning, 16(3): 12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 蒋 峦, 蓝 海林 (Jiang Luan, Lan Hailin) (2004). 基于动态环境的企业竞争优势研究 (Research on Enterprises’ Competitive Advantage under Dynamic Environment). 北京: 经济科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  18. 蓝 海林 (Lan Hailin) (2004). 经济转型中国有企业集团行为的研究 (Research on Behaviors of China’s State-owned Corporate Groups in Transitional Economy). 北京: 经济科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  19. 蓝 海林 (Lan Hailin) (2001). 迈向世界级企业—中国企业战略맜理研究 (Become a World-leading Company—Research on China’s Corporate Strategic Management). 北京: 企业맜理出版社

    Google Scholar 

  20. 张 平, 蓝 海林 (Zhang Ping, Lan Hailin) (2004). 我国上市公司高层맜理团队异质性与企业绩效的关系研究 (Research on the Heterogeneity of the Upper Echelon of China’s Listed Companies and Enterprise Performance). 北京: 经济科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hailin Lan.

Additional information


Translated and revised from Nankai guanli pinglun 南开管理评论 (Nankai Business Review), 2007, 10(5): 31–35

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lan, H. Corporate strategic management: Static and dynamic paradigms. Front. Bus. Res. China 3, 50–62 (2009).

Download citation


  • dynamic competition
  • corporate strategies
  • strategic management pattern


  • 动态竞争
  • 企业战略
  • 战略管理模式