Skip to main content

The formation and operation of modular organization: A case study on Haier’s “market-chain” reform

Abstract

The concept of modularity can be applied not only to complex product system design, but also to business system interpretation and design. However, the amount of literature on modular organization is much less than that on product modularity. Based upon a case study on Haier’s reengineered business-process system after the “market-chain” reform, this paper examines the course of its process decomposition to form a prototype of modular organization, and further analyzes the evolution of the three key factors in the design rules, which make the independent modules interact with others to form a complex system. The study shows that a system will gain strategic flexibility when more business units in service supplying and product manufacturing are treated as modules of the firm. Meanwhile, a system will become more complex when the number and variety of modules increase, which in turn induces the evolution in the process of the modular organization’s decomposition and integration.

摘要

模块化思想不仅可用于复杂产品系统的设计, 也可用来解释或指导企业业务活动的组织。 当前有关组织模块化的研究明显弱于产品模块化设计的研究。 以海尔集团 “市场链” 再造前后的内部流程系统作为案例研究对象, 在考察其流程系统由职能集中或统一走向模块化解构后, 从业务运作过程中拥有自主性的流程模块如何与相邻的其他子系统互动的角度, 详细分析了有助于实现流程模块化集结的 “设计规则三要素” 及其演变, 由此探讨了模块化组织模式的形成及运作特点。 研究显示, 将提供服务与制造产品的单位一并作为企业业务组织的模块单元, 使整个系统可以在多样化的模块构成中增强战略柔性。 而随着系统构成要素和类别的增多, 系统运行的复杂性也增大, 从而模块化解构与集结的过程更表现出演化的特点。

References

  1. Aoki M, Ando K (2003). An Age of Modularity: The Nature of New Industrial Structure. Shanghai Far East Publishers of China

  2. Baldwin C Y, Clark K B (1997). Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5): 84–93

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin C Y, Clark K B (2000). Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brusoni S, Prencipe A (2001). Unpacking the black of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1): 179–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brusoni S, Prencipe A (2006). Making design rules: A multi-domain perspective. Organization Science, 17(2): 179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J, Gui B and Chen Y (2006). Case investigation of complex product systems innovation based on modularity development. Science Research Management, 27(6): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daft R L, Lewin A Y (1993). Where are the theories of the ‘new’ organizational forms: an editorial essay. Organization Science, 4(4): i–vi

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drucker P F (1974). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer W A (1999). Building Market Chains at Haier. CEIBS GM939/2000 EFMD GM939; in Building market Chains at Hair—IMD Cases (ed. by Haier University, 2006, 6)

  11. Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Langlois R N (2003). Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organization, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hammer M, Champy J (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Business

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hao Bin, Ren Hao, Guerin A M (2007). Design of organizational modularity: Basic principles and theoretical structure. China Industrial Economy, (6): 80–87 (in Chinese)

  14. Hoetker G (2006). Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management Journal, 27: 501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ji Xuehong, Chen Rongqiu, Tang Zhongjun (2004). Research on modularity and integration in PC industry. China Industrial Economy, (10): 91–96 (in Chinese)

  16. Ke En (2007). The final goals of leadership: A special interview with Haier’s CEO Zhang Ruiming. Harvard Business Review China, (1): 70–79

  17. Langlois R N (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49(1): 19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Langlois R N, Foss N J (1997). Capabilities and governance: The rebirth of production in the theory of economic organization. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, Working Paper No. 97-2

  19. Lei Ruqiao, Chen Jixiang, Liu Qin (2004). Comparison of organization model and their efficiencies based on modularity. China Industrial Economy, (10): 83–92 (in Chinese)

  20. Lu Feng (2007). Study on china’s participation of international service outsourcing. Economy Research, (9): 49–51 (in Chinese)

  21. Ma Gang (2002). Haier’s pattern of operation process restructuring and its economic analysis. Policy-Making Reference, 15(1): 7–11 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mintzberg H (1979). The Structuring of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ouyang Taohua (2003). Competing based on high level for China’s companies: Case study on Haier. Management World, (2): 116–126 (in Chinese)

  24. Palepu K S, Khanna T, Vagras I (2006). Haier: Taking a Chinese Company Global. Harvard Business School Cases 9-706-401, Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rummler G, Brache A (1990). Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization. Char San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sanches R, Mahoney J T (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 63–76

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schilling M A, Steensma H K (2001). The use of modular Organizational Forms: An industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6): 1149–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Siggelkow N (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon H A (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106: 467–482

    Google Scholar 

  30. Su Huiwen (2001). Haier’s managerial innovation: Market chain and business process re-engineering. Nankai Management Review, (1): 42–48 (in Chinese)

  31. Wang Fengbin (1997). Leaders and Modern Firms’ Organization. Economics and Management Publishing House (in Chinese)

  32. Worren N, Moore K, Cardona P (2002). Modularity, strategic flexibility and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12): 1123–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu Peiliang, Zheng Mingshen, Wang Fengbin (1998). The Theory and Designing of Structure. Economics and Management Publishing House (in Chinese)

  34. Xiao Hailin, Peng Xinglu, Wang Fanghua (2004). A born mechanism model for a firm’s sustained growth: Based the case study on Haier. Management Word, (8): 118–125 (in Chinese)

  35. Xie Wei (2004). Modularity and the emerging of China mobile phone manufacturing industry. Science and Technology Management Research, (4): 20–23 (in Chinese)

  36. Xu H, Yan A, Pan X, Ma S (2005). Modular organization and corporate gene rebuilding. China Industrial Economy, (6): 52–59 (in Chinese)

  37. Zhang Jun (2003). A Guide for the Chinese Version. In An Age of Modularity: the Nature of New Industrial Structure (ed. by Aoki M, Ando K), Shanghai Far East Publishers of China (in Chinese)

  38. Zhang Ruimin (2007). Raising Haier. Harvard Business Review, 85(2): 141–146

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu Lin, Xu Qingrui, Wang Fangrui (2006). Transformation from the integration between R&D and marketing to synergy between technological innovation and market innovation. Science Research Management, 27(5): 1–9 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhu Ruibo (2004). Analysis on mechanism of resistance industry cluster’s endogenous risk by modularity. China Industrial Economy, (5): 54–60 (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengbin Wang.

Additional information

Translated and revised from Guanli Shijie 맜理世界 (Management World), 2008, (4): 122–139

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, F., Chen, G. & Li, D. The formation and operation of modular organization: A case study on Haier’s “market-chain” reform. Front. Bus. Res. China 2, 621–654 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-008-0034-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • modularity
  • decomposition
  • integration
  • business processes
  • evolution

关键词

  • 模块化
  • 解构
  • 集结
  • 业务流程
  • 演化