Skip to main content
  • Research Article
  • Published:

How does organizational trust benefit work performance?

Abstract

We studies the relationship between organizational trust and work performance through questionnaire method. By establishing six nested models and two non-nested models and comparing them with the hypotheses model, we find that an employee’s trust in his/her immediate superior, co-workers, and the top manager all exert positive influences upon his/her work performance and these influences are independent and supplementary to one another. We also discuss the complex effects of an individual’s perception of different organizational members upon their behaviors. It is found that the influence of an employee’s trust in top manager upon individuals’ job performance is partially mediated by his/her trust in immediate superiors.

摘要

通过问卷调查, 对组织内信任与工作绩效之间的关系进行了研究。 研究采用结构方程建模方法, 通过建构6个嵌套模型和2个非嵌套模型, 将其与假设模型进行比较验证研究假设。 结果表明, 个体对直接领导、 同事和高层맜理者的信任都会对个体的工作绩效产生影响, 并且彼此间的效应相互独立, 彼此互补。 同时, 研究也讨论了多种不同信任对个体工作行为产生影响的过程中, 个体对不同对象的知觉对行为复杂影响, 并发现基于对高层맜理者的信任, 进而对工作绩效的影响效应部分由对直接领导的信任传递。

References

  • Argyris C (1964). Integrating the Individual and the Organization. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryee S, Budhwar P S, Chen Z X (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of asocial exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima K, Li H (2002). When does trust matter? Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee trust on performance in selling new products in China and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 66: 61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin R (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1: 185–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley P, Cummings L L (1996). Transaction costs in organizations with trust. In: Bies R, Lewicki R, Sheppard B, eds. Research on Negotation in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 219–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S P, Leigh T W (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell J, Ferres N, Travaglione T (2003). Trust in the workplace: The importance of interpersonal and organizational support. Journal of Management Research, 3(2): 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Costigan R D, Ilter S, Berman J (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10: 303–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Schoorman F D, Mayer R, Tan, H (2000). Trusted unit manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management, 21(1): 563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks K T (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 1,004–1,012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks K T, Ferrin D L (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12: 450–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks K T, Ferrin D L (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 611–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson A (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis K, Shockley-Zalabak P (2001). Trust in top management and immediate supervisor: The relationship to satisfaction, perceived organizational effectiveness, and information receiving. Communication Quarterly, 49: 382

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferres N, Connell J, Travaglione A (2004). Co-worker trust as a social catalyst for constructive employee attitudes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19: 608–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould-Williams J (2003). The importance of HR practices and work place trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations. Human Resource Management, 14: 28–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan R, Curphy G, Hogan J (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49: 493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Bentler P M (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, (3): 424–453

  • Kirkpatrick S A, Locke E A (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 36–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer R M (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer R C, Davis J H (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer R C, Gavin M B (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48: 874–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister D (1995). Affect-based and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D E, Zeffane R (2003). Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management. International journal of human resource management, 14(1): 55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne R L, Clark M C (2003). Dispositional and situational determinants of trust in two types of managers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14: 128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Moorman R, Fetter R (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, (1): 107–142

  • Porter T, Lilly B (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict management, (7): 361–376

  • Rousseau D M, Sitkin S B, Burt R S, Camerer C (1996). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23: 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim C, Castro S, Cogliser C (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic procedures. Leadership Quarterly, 10: 63–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan H H, Tan C S F (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126: 241–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui A S, Pearce J L, Porter L W, Tripoli A M (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1089–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong Y T, Wong C S, Ngo H Y (2002). Loyalty to supervisor and trust in supervisor of workers in Chinese joint ventures: A test of two competing models. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13: 883–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Jin.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Xinli Xuebao 心理学报 (Acta Psychological Sinica), 2006, 38(5): 770–777

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, N., Yan, J. & Jin, M. How does organizational trust benefit work performance?. Front. Bus. Res. China 1, 622–637 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-007-0035-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-007-0035-7

Keywords

关键词