Skip to main content

Audit committee, board characteristics and quality of financial reporting: An empirical research on Chinese securities market


Board independence and the board’s expertise characteristics are key factors influencing the quality of financial reporting. Companies, having a higher percentage of independent directors, having independent financial directors, or having an audit committee on board are more likely to generate quality accounting earnings information. Variables representing board behavior characteristics, namely, ratio of shares owned by the board, board meeting frequency within a year, and the number of independent directors holding posts concurrently in the controlling shareholder’s company, are not significantly related to the quality of financial reporting. Board meeting frequency is even abnormally negatively related to the quality of financial reporting.


董事会的独立性、专业性特征是影响我国上市公司财务呈报质量的重要因素, 公司拥有更高比例的独立董事、拥有财务独立董事、或者设有审计专门委员会, 均能更好地抑制公司的盈余맜理动机或程度, 从而呈报更高质量的会计盈余信息。 然而作为表征董事会行为特征的变量, 如董事会的持股水平、董事会年度会议频率和兼任控股股东职务等, 却与公司盈余质量之间没有显著关系, 甚至会议频率与盈余质量之间出现了反常的负相关关系。


  1. Abbott L J, Parker S, Peters G F (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1): 69–87

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott L J, Park Y, Parker S (2000). The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11): 55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson R C, Mansi S A, Reeb D M (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3): 315–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beasley M S (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(October): 443–465

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bedard J, Chtourou S M, Courteau L (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Journal of Practice and Theory, (September): 13–35

  6. Cadbury Committee (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance London. UK: Gee

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cai Ning, Liang Lizhen (2003). An empirical analysis of the relation between corporate governance and financial statement fraud. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, (11): 80–84 (in Chinese)

  8. Chtourou S, Bedard J, Courteau L (2001). Corporate governance and earnings management. Working paper. University Laval, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dechow P, Sloan R, Sweeney A (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, (13): 1–26

  10. Farber D B (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? Accounting Review, 80(2): 539–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Financial Reprinting Council (2003). Combined Code on Corporate Governance. London, UK: FRC. Available at:

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao Minghua, Ma Shouli (2002). An empirical analysis of the relationship between independent director system and corporate performance—concurrently discusses the system environment for Chinese independent directors to exercises the right effectively. Nankai Economic Studies, (2): 64–68 (in Chinese)

  13. Hermalin B E, Weisbach M S (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4): 101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu Qinqin, Shen Yifeng (2002). Can independent directors improve the listed companies’ performance. World Economy, (7): 55–63 (in Chinese)

  15. Jonas G J, Blancher J (2000). Assessing quality of financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 14(3): 353–363

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kao Lanfeng, Chen Anlin (2004). The effects of board characteristics on earnings management. Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(3): 96–107

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klein A (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, (33): 375–400

  18. Li Changqing, Lai Jianqing (2004). Do the characteristics of board of directors affect firm’s performance? Journal of Finance Research, (5): 64–77 (in Chinese)

  19. Li Weian, Zhang Yaowei (2004). Inverse U-shape relationship between board governance of listed companies and their performances. Economic Theory and Business Management, (8): 36–42 (in Chinese)

  20. Li Weian, Zhang Yaowei (2005). Empirical study on the evaluation of the board governance of China’s listed companies. Modern Economic Science, (1): 17–23 (in Chinese)

  21. Liu Liguo, Du Ying (2003). An empirical research on the relationship between corporate governance and the quality of accounting information. Accounting Research, (2): 28–36 (in Chinese)

  22. Lu Jianqiao (1999). The empirical study of the earnings management of Chinese listed companies. Accounting Research, (9): 25–35 (in Chinese)

  23. McMullen D A (1996). Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and theory, (Spring): 87–103

  24. Park Y W, Shin H H (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada. Journal of Corporate Finance, (10): 431–457

  25. Peasnell K V, Pope P F, Young S (1999). Outside directors, board effectiveness and abnormal accruals. Working paper. Lancaster University

  26. Peasnell K V, Pope P F, Young S (2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(7): 1311–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pu Zili, Liu Shaojia (2004). The leading structure of directorate under the control of corporation and the corporate performance. Management World, (9): 117–123 (in Chinese)

  28. Tan Jinshong (2003). The Independent Directors and Corporate Governance: A Study Based on Chinese Listed Companies. Beijing: Chinese Financial Economical Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Uzun, Hatice, Szewczyk, Samuel H, Varma, Raj (2004). Board composition and corporate fraud. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(3): 33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Liyan, Liu Junxia (2004). The Double Reports Difference of the Stock A-H and the Corporate Governance. Beijing: Beijing University Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Yuetang (2003). The validity of the independent directorate system: Based on preliminary review of the behavior of voluntary establishing independent directors. Economic Science, (2): 87–97 (in Chinese)

  32. Wu Qinghua (2004). The quality review of the financial reporting: A conformal point—an angle of view to face the international accounting. Available online at

  33. Xie B, Devidson W N, DaDalt P J (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, (9): 295–316

  34. Yu Dongzhi, Wang Huacheng (2003). Independent directors and corporate governance theory and experience. Accounting Research, (8): 8–14 (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghua Wu.

Additional information

Translated from Guangli Pinglun 管理评论 (Business Review), 2006, (7): 49–56

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Q., Wang, P. & Yin, J. Audit committee, board characteristics and quality of financial reporting: An empirical research on Chinese securities market. Front. Bus. Res. China 1, 385–400 (2007).

Download citation


  • independent director institution
  • imposed changes
  • board characteristics
  • quality of financial reporting


  • 独立董事制度
  • 强制性变迁
  • 董事会特征
  • 盈余质量