Skip to main content


The impact structure of social capital on corporate performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China

Article metrics

  • 376 Accesses

  • 1 Citations


Vertical relationships with the government, particular relational capital and organizational social network capital, constitute corporate social capital (CSC). Using the empirical data of 97 listed companies in China, this paper examines the impact of CSC on corporate performance, finds that CSC has a positive impact on sales revenue but an insignificant impact on the improvement of ROA. More specifically, when a firm enlarges its sales revenue, the function of organizational network capital is stronger than that of a particular relational capital and that of governmental connections. The paper also finds that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have more advantages in using governmental connections, therefore leading to better social status than non-SOEs do, who have fewer advantages in using any particular relational capital. The article suggests that managers should appraise carefully the effectiveness of CSC, and combine it with other resources; firms should distinguish the structure of the impact of CSC on performance improvement in a dynamic way. With respect to the implication of this paper, it could help in analyzing firm behaviors in the transitional China.


  1. Adler P, Kwon S (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 10–16

  2. Baker W (2000). Achieving Success Through Social Capital: Tapping the Hidden Resources in Your Personal and Business Networks. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

  3. Barney J B (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120

  4. Batjargal B, Liu M M (2004). Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15(4): 159–172

  5. Bian Yanjie, Qiu Haixiong (2000). The Social Capital and Its Efficiency. Social Sciences in China, (2): 87–99 (in Chinese)

  6. Bian Yanjie, Soon A (1997). Guanxi Networks and Job Mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3): 981–1006

  7. Blyler M, Coff R (2003). Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that Split Pies. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(7): 677–686

  8. Burt R (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

  9. Cheung S (1983). The Contractual nature of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1): 1–21

  10. Coase R (1937). The nature of the firm. Economia, 4(16): 368–405

  11. Cohen D, Prusak L (2001). In Good Company. How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

  12. Coleman J (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

  13. De Geus A (1996). The Living Company. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

  14. Fan G, Wang X (2005). The Marketization Index in China. Beijing: Economic Science Press

  15. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1990). Game Theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press

  16. Heertje A (1996). Introduction. In: Stiglitz J, eds. The Economic Role of the State. Beijing: China Goods Publishing House (in Chinese)

  17. Hüppi R, Seemann P (2001). Social Capital: Securing Competitive Advantage in the New Economy. London: Prentice-Hall

  18. Ikujiro N. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, (11/12): 96–104

  19. Kotter J, Heskett J (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: The Free Press

  20. Jin Bei (2003). The Report on Chinese Business Competence (2003). Beijing: Social Science Literature Press (in Chinese)

  21. Kotter J, Heskett J (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: The Free Press

  22. Lin Nan (2001). Social Capital: A theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press

  23. Lin Yifu, Cai F, Li Z. The Chinese Miracle: Development Strategy and Economic Reform. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press (in Chinese)

  24. Nahapiet J, Goshal S (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 242–266

  25. Nelson R R, Winter S G (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

  26. Peng M W, Luo Y (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 486–501

  27. Peng Y (2004). Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5): 1045–1074

  28. Podolny J M, Page K L (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1): 57–76.

  29. Porter, M E (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press

  30. Porter, M E (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press

  31. Portes A (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1): 1–24

  32. Powell W W, Smith-Doerr L (1994). Networks and economic life. In: Smelser N J, Swedgerg R, eds. The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Priceton University Press, 368–402

  33. Powell W W (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. In: Staw B M, Cummings L L, eds. Research of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 12. Greemwich CT: JAI Press, 295–336

  34. Prahalad, C K, Hamel, G (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, (5/6): 79–91

  35. Putanam R (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

  36. Shi Junwei, Hu Lijun (2005). The voluntary supply of corporate social capital: A static game model. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, (8): 9–16 (in Chinese)

  37. Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509–533

  38. Tsui A, Farh J, Katherine X, Xiao Z (2006). Hierarchical ties and network closure as social capital for Chinese managers. Working paper, Arizona State University

  39. Uzzi B (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm network: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67

  40. Wernerfelt B (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171–180

  41. Yang Y, Huang D, Li B (2001). Science of complexity and the management theory. Management World, (2): 167–174 (in Chinese)

  42. Zhang W (1995). The Entrepreneur of a Firm: A Contractual Theory. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Junwei Shi.

Additional information

Translated from paper in International Symposium on Entrepreneur Research and Education, 2006, April (in Chinese)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article


  • social capital
  • corporate performance
  • listed company
  • China