Skip to main content

Advertisement

Frontiers of Business Research in China
Frontiers of Business Research in China Cover Image

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

Research in information systems in China (1999–2005) and international comparisons

Frontiers of Business Research in Chinavolume 1, pages19–38 (2007) | Download Citation

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the research activities in information systems (IS) in the mainland of China. We reviewed and analyzed a total of 859 research papers in information systems published in 18 leading academic journals in business and management in the mainland from 1999 to 2005. Applying the content analysis method, we first categorized the papers by their reference disciplines, research topics, research methods, and the units of analysis. The data were then compared with the results of similar Western studies. Results show that, among the published IS research papers in the mainland of China, IS research itself represents the primary theoretical reference discipline; organizational and system/software issues are the main topics of the focus; non-empirical studies were the dominant research method; and the majority of studies were conducted at the organizational and/or system level. Compared with the West, IS research in China demonstrates its own characteristics in theoretical foundations, research focuses, and research methods, and there are a number of areas that need to be improved.

References

  1. Alavi M, Carlson P (1992). A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(4): 45–62

  2. Alavi M, Carlson P, Brooke G (1989). The ecology of MIS research: A twenty year status review. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, 363–375

  3. Applegate L, King J (1999). Rigor and relevance: Careers on the line. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 18–19

  4. Banker R D, Kauffman R J (2004). The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in management science. Management Science, 50(3): 281–298

  5. Banville C, Landry M (1989). Can the field of MIS be disciplined? Communications of the ACM, 32(1): 48–60

  6. Benbasat I, Goldstein D K, Mead M (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3): 369–386

  7. Benbasat I, Zmud R W (1999). Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 3–17

  8. Benbasat I, Weber R (1996). Rethinking “diversity” in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7(4): 389–399

  9. Cheon M, Grover V, Saberwal R (1993). The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity. Information and Management, 24(3): 107–119

  10. Claver E, González R, Llopis J (2000). An analysis of research in information systems (1981–1997). Information and Management, 37(4): 181–195

  11. Culnan M (1986). The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972–1982: A co-citation analysis. Management Science, 32(2): 156–172

  12. Culnan M, Swanson E B (1986). Research in management information systems 1980–1984: Points of work and reference. MIS Quarterly, 10(3): 289–301

  13. Dubé L, Paré G (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4): 597–635

  14. Farhoomand A F, Drury D H (1999). A historiographical examination of information systems. Communication of the AIS, (1): 1–27

  15. Farhoomand A F, Drury D H (2001). Diversity and scientific progress in the information systems discipline. Communications of the AIS, (5): 1–21

  16. Galliers R D, Land F F (1987). Choosing an appropriate information systems research methodology. Communications of the ACM, 30(11): 900–902

  17. Grover V, Lee C C, Durand D (1993). Analyzing methodological rigor of MIS survey research from 1980–1989. Information and Management, 24(6): 305–317

  18. Hamilton S, Ives B (1982). MIS research strategies. Information and Management, 5(6): 339–347

  19. Hu Changping (1999). Education of information management towards the 21st century in China. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information (in Chinese), 18(1): 3–9

  20. Huang W, Wei K K, Watson R (2003). Overview of MIS discipline — background, core courses, research mainstreams and major conferences and journals. Journal of Management Sciences in China (in Chinese), 6(6): 85–90

  21. Ives B, Hamilton S, Davis G (1980). A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science, 26(9): 910–934

  22. Kim G M, Park C S, Kim J S, Lee H G, Im K S (2005). An empirical study on research diversity in Journal of MIS Research (in Korean). The Journal of MIS Research, 15(2): 149–170

  23. Lee A S (1999). Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 29–34

  24. Lee A S, Baskerville R L (2003). Generalizing generalizability in Information Systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3): 221–243

  25. Lyytinen K (1999). Empirical research in information systems: On the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 25–28

  26. Mingers J (2001). Combining IS research methods, towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3): 240–259

  27. Mingers J (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal, 13(3): 233–249

  28. Nolan R L, Wetherbe J C (1980). Toward a comprehensive framework for MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 4(2): 1–19

  29. Paul R J (2002). Is information systems as intellectual subject? European Journal of Information Systems, 11(2): 174–177

  30. Robey D (1996). Diversity in information systems research: Threat, promise, and responsibility. Information Systems Research, 7(4): 400–408

  31. Swanson E B, Ramiller N C (1993). Information systems research thematics: Submissions to a new journal, 1987–1992. Information Systems Research, 4(4): 299–330

  32. Vessey I, Ramesh R, Glass R L (2002). Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2): 129–174

  33. Wang Shouyang and Jin Bihui (2000). SCI, SSCI and journals of management science. Journal of Management Science in China (in Chinese), 3(4): 1–6

  34. Webster J, Watson R T (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2): xii–xxiii

  35. Zha Xianjin (2003). Probe into talent cultivating direction and course system in the specialty of information management and information system. Journal of China Society for Scientific and Technical Information (in Chinese), 22(4): 507–512

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Sprott Business School, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, KIS 5B6, Canada

    • Shaobo Ji

  2. School of Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China

    • Shaobo Ji
    •  & Qingfei Min

  3. IBM Solution & Services Co. Ltd. at IBM China, Dalian, 116023, China

    • Weihe Han

Authors

  1. Search for Shaobo Ji in:

  2. Search for Qingfei Min in:

  3. Search for Weihe Han in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaobo Ji.

Additional information

Translated from Guanli Kexue Xuebao 맜理科学学报 (Journal of Management Sciences in China), 2006, 9(2): 76–85

The original published paper was based on the data from 1999 to 2003. The current paper is based on the data from 1999 to 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Keywords

  • information systems
  • content analysis
  • research topic
  • research method
  • units of analysis