Skip to main content

Table 3 2SLS instrumental variable model

From: The capital market spillover effect of product market advertising: Evidence from stock price synchronicity

Variable  

First stage

Second stage

(1)

(2)

IV_Ad

1.027a (11.87)

 

H_Ad

 

−2.027a (−3.15)

Debt

−0.008c (−1.89)

−0.272a (−4.47)

Size

−0.001 (−0.76)

0.015 (0.96)

Mb

0.001c (1.65)

−0.042b (−2.38)

Turnover

−0.001a (−2.62)

−0.111a (−12.33)

Big4

0.007b (2.17)

−0.127a (−3.00)

Age

0.002 (1.27)

0.055a (3.06)

Roa

0.061a (4.29)

0.043 (0.21)

Institution

0.001 (0.44)

−0.235a (−4.58)

Top1

0.004 (0.72)

−0.172b (−2.57)

Msh

0.001 (0.78)

0.016 (0.79)

Independent

−0.008 (−0.68)

0.067 (0.42)

_Cons

0.013 (0.81)

0.278 (0.75)

Year fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Industry fixed effects

Yes

Yes

No. of obs.

9,360

9,360

With-in R2

0.315

0.323

Cragg-Donald Wald F

2093.599a

 
  1. Notes. Numbers in parentheses are t-statistics based on standard errors clustered by firm when we control for year and industry effects
  2. a, b, and c denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively