Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix

From: R&D spending, strategic position and firm performance

Variables

Mean

Std.Dev.

5th Pctl.

25th Pctl.

Median

75th Pctl.

95th Pctl.

Panel A: Descriptive Statistics

 R&D (%)

3.259

2.823

0.000

1.050

3.100

4.390

8.488

 ROA

0.045

0.052

−0.033

0.014

0.040

0.073

0.135

 ROE

0.070

0.098

−0.073

0.027

0.068

0.118

0.221

 TOBINQ

2.289

1.741

0.470

1.078

1.804

2.961

5.809

 OPROF

0.072

0.117

−0.091

0.017

0.063

0.131

0.254

 ATURN

3.865

3.520

0.874

1.633

2.762

4.746

10.667

 SIZE

21.923

1.164

20.360

21.094

21.745

22.544

24.194

 LEV

0.408

0.200

0.097

0.247

0.403

0.565

0.736

 SALES

21.359

1.364

19.395

20.431

21.205

22.109

23.963

If R&D (%) > 0

 R&D (%)

3.595

2.753

0.170

1.741

3.270

4.590

8.760

 ROA

0.046

0.052

−0.030

0.015

0.042

0.074

0.135

 ROE

0.071

0.095

−0.066

0.028

0.069

0.118

0.216

 TOBINQ

2.320

1.749

0.470

1.104

1.835

3.020

5.871

 OPROF

0.075

0.117

−0.085

0.018

0.066

0.135

0.261

 ATURN

3.852

3.430

0.895

1.685

2.797

4.739

10.489

 SIZE

21.912

1.150

20.369

21.098

21.734

22.512

24.162

 LEV

0.399

0.198

0.094

0.239

0.392

0.548

0.729

 SALES

21.340

1.344

19.406

20.422

21.176

22.081

23.872

Panel B: Correlation Matrix

 

R&D (%)

ROA

ROE

TOBINQ

OPROF

ATURN

SIZE

LEV

 ROA

0.085***

       

 ROE

0.018*

0.886***

      

 TOBINQ

0.267***

0.344***

0.184***

     

 OPROF

0.141***

0.808***

0.691***

0.290***

    

 ATURN

−0.055***

0.272***

0.272***

0.056***

0.099***

   

 SIZE

−0.212***

−0.047***

0.070***

−0.489***

−0.077***

0.030***

  

 LEV

−0.350***

−0.405***

− 0.196***

−0.481***

− 0.447***

−0.012

0.515***

 

 SALES

−0.337***

0.037***

0.153***

−0.472***

−0.088***

0.215***

0.913***

0.529***

  1. Notes. Panel A shows the descriptive statistics while Panel B shows the correlation matrix and reports Pearson correlations below the diagonal with ***, ** and * indicating significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively