From: Can returnee managers promote CSR performance? Evidence from China
 | Y = CSR_Score i,t | Y = CSR_Rate i,t | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
Returnee (0/1) i,t | 1.709** | Â | 0.078** | Â |
(2.10) | Â | (2.39) | Â | |
Returnee number i,t | Â | 1.318*** | Â | 0.058*** |
 | (2.71) |  | (2.84) | |
State control (0/1) i,t | −1.900 | −1.888 | −0.070 | −0.070 |
(−1.43) | (−1.42) | (−1.46) | (−1.44) | |
Board Independence i,t | 10.102* | 10.288* | 0.339 | 0.348 |
(1.74) | (1.77) | (1.48) | (1.52) | |
Power balance i,t | −0.046 | −0.046 | −0.002* | −0.002* |
(−1.21) | (−1.21) | (−1.75) | (−1.75) | |
Duality (0/1) i,t | −0.609 | −0.606 | −0.021 | −0.021 |
(−1.07) | (−1.06) | (−0.96) | (−0.95) | |
Managerial ownership i,t | 2.983* | 3.062* | 0.040 | 0.043 |
(1.70) | (1.74) | (0.59) | (0.64) | |
Institutional ownership i,t | 12.859*** | 12.902*** | 0.466*** | 0.468*** |
(8.95) | (9.00) | (8.26) | (8.32) | |
Firm age i,t | 0.083 | 0.080 | 0.003 | 0.003 |
(1.42) | (1.36) | (1.44) | (1.38) | |
Size i,t | 5.998*** | 5.952*** | 0.189*** | 0.187*** |
(21.70) | (21.41) | (17.62) | (17.36) | |
ROA i,t | 75.635*** | 75.679*** | 1.539*** | 1.540*** |
(19.15) | (19.16) | (10.87) | (10.89) | |
Leverage i,t | −4.934*** | −4.905*** | −0.087* | −0.086* |
(−3.92) | (−3.90) | (−1.91) | (−1.88) | |
Inverse Mills Ratio | 9.872*** | 9.742*** | 0.451*** | 0.447*** |
(4.51) | (4.37) | (4.95) | (4.81) | |
Intercept | −117.146*** | −116.201*** | −2.312*** | −2.270*** |
(−18.03) | (−17.80) | (−9.08) | (−8.89) | |
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Industry | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Observations | 9519 | 9519 | 9519 | 9519 |
Adjusted R-squared | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.23 | 0.23 |