From: Can returnee managers promote CSR performance? Evidence from China
 | Y = CSR_Score i,t | Y = CSR_Rate i,t | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (4) | (5) | |
Returnee (0/1) i,t | 1.274 | Â | 0.054* | Â |
(1.56) | Â | (1.66) | Â | |
Returnee number i,t | Â | 0.862** | Â | 0.035** |
 | (2.53) |  | (2.48) | |
State control (0/1) i,t | 1.116 | −0.329 | 0.014 | 0.000 |
(0.39) | (−0.14) | (0.12) | (0.00) | |
Board Independence i,t | 3.047 | 12.268 | 0.131 | 0.526 |
(0.31) | (1.52) | (0.33) | (1.59) | |
Power balance i,t | −0.052 | −0.005 | −0.002 | −0.001 |
(−0.91) | (−0.11) | (−0.91) | (−0.59) | |
Duality (0/1) i,t | −0.042 | −1.600* | −0.012 | −0.056 |
(−0.04) | (−1.79) | (−0.27) | (−1.53) | |
Managerial ownership i,t | 1.424 | −0.431 | −0.050 | −0.088 |
(0.39) | (−0.15) | (−0.33) | (−0.74) | |
Institutional ownership i,t | 10.648*** | 14.763*** | 0.354*** | 0.547*** |
(4.87) | (7.42) | (4.03) | (6.70) | |
Firm age i,t | −0.002 | 0.041 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
(−0.02) | (0.55) | (0.08) | (0.50) | |
Size i,t | 6.833*** | 6.825*** | 0.243*** | 0.240*** |
(16.05) | (19.04) | (14.20) | (16.32) | |
ROA i,t | 66.604*** | 84.315*** | 1.684*** | 1.786*** |
(8.67) | (14.04) | (5.45) | (7.25) | |
Leverage i,t | −7.241*** | −5.911*** | −0.242** | −0.165** |
(−3.03) | (−3.05) | (−2.52) | (−2.08) | |
Intercept | −121.646*** | −134.466*** | −2.983*** | −3.412*** |
(−12.72) | (−16.34) | (−7.75) | (−10.11) | |
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Industry | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Observations | 2248 | 2248 | 2248 | 2248 |
Adjusted R–squared | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.28 |