Skip to main content

Table 8 Hierarchical analyses of ownership and innovation performance: IV GMM estimation

From: Impact of ownership types on R&D intensity and innovation performance—evidence from transitional China

 

New product sales/Sales

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Independent variables

 State stock concentration

0.053***

0.057***

  
 

(0.006)

(0.006)

  

 Private stock concentration

−0.006***

−0.004***

  
 

(0.001)

(0.001)

  

 Central SOEs

  

0.260***

0.265***

   

(0.021)

(0.021)

 Local SOEs

  

0.006***

0.007***

   

(0.002)

(0.002)

 POEs

  

−0.006***

−0.005***

   

(0.001)

(0.001)

Control variables

 R&D intensity

 

1.706***

 

1.645***

  

(0.078)

 

(0.077)

 Capital stock

0.010***

0.009***

0.009***

0.009***

 

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

 Foreign ownership

−0.007***

−0.005***

−0.007***

−0.004***

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

 Leverage

−0.002**

−0.002***

−0.003***

−0.002***

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

 Employee training

−0.001

−0.138*

−0.046

−0.296***

 

(0.033)

(0.071)

(0.045)

(0.081)

 Capital intensity

−0.000***

−0.000***

−0.000***

−0.000***

 

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

 Return to assets

0.007***

0.006***

0.006***

0.006***

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

 Industry dummy

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Region dummy

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Year dummy

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N

465003

459147

465003

459147

Endogeneity test

57.57***

69.89***

128.43***

145.89***

Instrument redundancy test

4647.96***

4518.90***

1233.19***

1205.64***

  1. ** and *** are significantly different from zero at the 5% and 1% level respectively