- Research Article
- Published:
Network architecture and firm performance: A resources-based view
Frontiers of Business Research in China volume 5, pages 559–579 (2011)
Abstract
Previous studies have investigated alliance networks primarily from two alternative views, a relational view that focuses on the “strength of strong/weak ties,” or a structural view that refers to a firm’s position and structural embeddedness. We posit a firm’s network architecture, i.e., the portfolio of strong/weak ties, influences its conduct and performance. From a resource-based view, the network architecture itself could be a source of sustained competitive advantage. We argue that both network architecture and duration of a firm can enhance its performance. However, their effects and the interaction are contingent on different performance outputs. Using strategic alliance networks data from a survey of the manufacturing industry in China, we examine the performance implications of network architecture. Results suggest that benefits from networks may evolve with network duration, hence firms should search for optimal network configurations. By integrating an alliance portfolio, firms with dual network architectures can enjoy both the strengths of strong ties and weak ties and avoid the risks inherent in a pure strong/weak-tie network.
References
Ahuja, G. 2000a. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 425–455.
Ahuja, G. 2000b. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 317–343.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.
Bian, Y. 1997. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3): 366–385.
Bian, Y., & Huang, X. 2009. Network resources and job mobility in China’s transitional economy. Research in the sociology of work, vol. 19: 255–282. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Burt, R. S. 1987. Social contagion and innovation-cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6): 1287–1335.
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2): 339–365.
Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22(2): 345–423.
Capaldo, A. 2007. Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6): 585–608.
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95–S120.
Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 2006. Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 681–703.
Gibbons, D. E. 2004. Network structure and innovation ambiguity effects on diffusion in dynamic organizational fields. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 938–951.
Goerzen, A. 2007. Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5): 487–509.
Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2005. The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4): 333–354.
Granovet M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic-action and social-structure—The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.
Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293–317.
Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397–420.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 203–215.
Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 275–286.
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. 2005. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146–165.
Kogut, B. 2000. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 405–425.
Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9): 795–816.
Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. 2008. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6): 639–661.
Lau, C. M., & Ngo, H. Y. 2001. Organization development and firm performance: A comparison of multinational and local firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 95–114.
Lavie, D. 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 638–658.
Lavie, D. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12): 1187–1212.
McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11): 1033–1055.
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1133–1156.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242–266.
Osborn, R. N., & Hagedoorn, J. 1997. The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2): 261–278.
Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1–24.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201–221.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 369–386.
Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7): 1113–1126.
Soh, P. H. 2010. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominant design. Strategic Management Journal, 31(4): 438–461.
Swaminathan, V., & Moorman, C. 2009. Marketing alliances, firm networks, and firm value creation. Journal of Marketing, 73(5): 52–69.
Tiwana, A. 2008. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3): 251–272.
Tsai, W. P. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996–1004.
Tsai, W. P., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464–476.
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.
Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. J. 1997. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2): 109–125.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171–180.
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9): 809–825.
Zajac, E. J. 1998. Commentary on “alliances and networks” by R. Gulati. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 319–321.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Gao, S. Network architecture and firm performance: A resources-based view. Front. Bus. Res. China 5, 559–579 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0145-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0145-0